Less is Store

Welcome to the devlog for “Less is Store”. This game was created for the GoGodot Jam (iteration 4).

Originally, I made an entirely different idea for this game jam. But my laptop is old and broken, and that idea was 3D … so after a few days, it just gave up. It crashed all the time, out of nowhere. And even if it didn’t, it was just too slow and laggy to stay motivated and productive.

So I hastily came up with this new idea: “Less is store”. Which was 2D and even simpler, so it had to be fine.

What’s the idea?

The theme of the jam was “Less is More”. When considering different genres, I stumbled upon the “tycoon” / “management” genre.

Usually, you start with nothing (an empty plot of land, no money, etcetera) and have to build it into something big.

What if we reverse that?

You start with a big store and lots of money. You want to empty the store (of machines/tables/whatever) and earn as little money as possible.

That … that was the whole idea.

Step 1: a random shop

For this, I use a trick I learned some time ago (while experimenting with random generation for my board games).

  • Start with an empty grid
  • Assign each cell a random “weight”
  • Ask a few imaginary entities to walk through this grid. (I use the built-in A* implementation of Godot. Very fast and simple to setup.)
  • The path they walk is marked as “empty” (and contains nothing)
  • Random cells next to that path are turned into obstacles (such as tables within the store from which items can be bought)

Repeat this until (at least) X% of the whole grid is filled, and you’re done.

Because the cells have random weights, the “pathfinding” algorithm will not necessarily pick the shortest path from one edge to another. It will deviate a bit, creating some corners and a more organic layout.

But because you mark the whole path as “must be empty”, you are sure that all areas of the store can be reached and have a pathway leading to it.

Implementation detail 1: I first generate the whole map, and only then draw it on one go. Mixing code/structure and drawing/graphics is basically never a good idea. Keeping it as two clearly separate steps prevents all sorts of nasty issues.

All the data about the cells is kept inside a CellData object. The visual representation is simply a node that adds some sprites/animations/extra logic, and has a variable called data that holds the original object.

Nearly 100% of the code in the game modifies the CellData data structure in the background. After every modification, I call sync_visuals_to_data (a function I programmed that does what it says), and it updates the visual side.

Implementation detail 2: each cell has several layers which need to be sorted correctly.

  • BG = players/clients are always on top of this
  • Floor = an overlay on the BG, still on the floor though
  • Overlay = this one is actually depth sorted, and players/clients can stand “behind” or “in front” of this

That’s why, after setting the cell’s type, I transfer each layer to the right location. In the future, I’ll probably need better names (and systems) for such layers. But hey, this was a quick game with simple graphics.

Step 2: add a player

This isn’t rocket science. The player is just a sprite with a body at the bottom. (Because of the perspective in such 2D games, the actual body that interacts with other stuff is only the bottom half of the sprite.)

  • When given input, it moves in that direction.
  • When you press SPACE, it dashes: it applies a sudden (huge) force in your current direction, which is dampened every frame (multiplied by something like 0.99), until you’re back at normal speed again and regain control.

The cells also get a (static) body, of course. The other clients get a body, but this one does not interact with the player body.

Instead, I detect if you “hit” a client by checking if the Area2D overlaps it. Why?

  • The area can be bigger than the actual player. Which feels better to play. (Otherwise you might have near misses all the time, missing clients by a pixel, which just feels frustrating and unfair.)
  • If their bodies also collide, that might happen before the area registers it. Which leads to messy situations where the bodies are pushed apart by the physics engine, and now the area doesn’t overlap anymore, and no hit is registered, which is a bug, …

I can’t create a walk animation to save my life. So I just use a very fast animation of two simple sprites :p And when you move towards the left, it flips horizontally (flip_h = velocity.x < 0).

Step 3: adding clients

I’ve already created the pathfinding code for generating the map (step 1). The clients merely have to reuse that, but add some extra behavior on top.

In short, they’re just one big state machine, with these states.


Whenever we switch to a new state, I execute any logic I need.

  • Walking? Pick a random table and find the path towards it. (If our backpack is full, go towards checkout instead.)
  • Grabbing? Add an item from a nearby table. Stand still for a bit. Then switch back to walking.
  • Stunned? Stand still for a bit. Then switch back to walking.
  • Arriving / Leaving? To make this look much better, I play some animations. While doing so, I don’t want the clients to interact with anything (as that would mess them up), so these states are basically “do-and-react-to-nothing”.

The “stand still for a bit” is handled by a simple Timer node, which fires once with a semi-random duration.

When I have a path for walking, I give it to a PathWalker module I wrote. It simply moves along the path at a certain speed, then checks when we’re done.

I expressly decided not to save the exact table or item we’re going towards. Because … it might be gone by the time we get there. (Remember, one goal is to clean out the store, which means the player needs to be able to destroy the tiles.) Instead, they just walk towards a destination. Something is there? Grab it (go to GRABBING). Nothing is there? Go to WALKING again, with a different destination.

Step 4: finishing the mechanics

If you could always dash … then there would be no point to it. It’s faster than walking. So let’s just slam that spacebar all the time! Never stop!

Additionally, a common issue with these kinds of games is that you can “camp” the location where your “enemies” arrive or leave.

To solve both issues, I decided to make dash a powerup you have to grab.

  • Each dash powerup adds +1 dash power.
  • This is clearly visible and intuitive. (More so than, for example, a dash bar that “automatically refills”. That’s more of a hidden mechanic that players will miss.)
  • It forces you to constantly move around and move away. (And to be smart about the routes you take.)
  • But it also allows you to “save up” on dash power, then use more of it at once for one big “attack”.

It felt like a very easy addition that solved almost all issues with the idea that were left.

In fact, I didn’t see anything else that needed solving. My only minor issues were …

  • Moving around; it felt like we needed teleports or some faster way to get to the other side of the store. At the same time, however … the whole challenge of the game is to position well and take smart routes.
  • Repetitiveness; such a simple game with simple rules, will obviously lead to doing a lot of the same thing.

But, in practice, these fell away. If the stages continue at the right pace, there’s always something new to challenge you. The store is big enough (and the layout random enough) to get new situations all the time.

During development (over the course of a few days) I kept making the player faster, because it just felt much better and more exciting. That solved the “teleport” issue as well.

Step 5: Teaching / Progression

I’ve learned that creating the tutorial for your game is something you do as quickly as possible.

  • It shows you how complicated the idea is. (And if too complicated, you must simplify right now.)
  • It must be done anyway, no matter what happens.
  • If you leave it until the last second, you’ll probably speed through it and provide a very bad tutorial. Which means your game might be awesome … but nobody knows, because nobody understands.

I’ve also learned, after creating many games, that giving all information / rules beforehand is never the way to go. Even if you make it “interactive”—like “now move towards the arrow” and “press A to do X now”—that doesn’t really work.

Instead, you must break all your rules and mechanics into small, bite-sized chunks. Then you feed them to the player one at a time, over time.

As such, I broke the game into “stages”.

  • When a new stage starts, it shows a very simple tutorial image with one new rule or idea being added.
  • Then the stage lasts for a fixed duration (30 seconds, or 60 seconds)
  • After which the next stage starts

The first stage? You can only move. Clients leave just by touching them.

The next stage adds dashing. Later stages add cell removal, different client types, a higher number of clients at the same time, and so forth.

This takes more work, at first. I have to map this out, build the system for stages, and create many more graphics and configurations.

But … once you have that, it’s a vastly superior system to anything else (so I’ve learned). I quickly asked others to test the game, didn’t have to explain anything beforehand, and they had absolutely no issue playing and understanding immediately.

Once you reach the last stage, quite a lot is going on. Multiple controls, different clients, some more mechanics/rules. But that’s no issue at all, because people learned them in bite-sized doses delivered once every 60 seconds.

Combining all that, we get something like the video below.

First prototype of game idea, after one evening of (panicked) work

Step 6: polish and finishing

Polishing means …

  • Adding sound effects
  • Adding animations
  • Adding particles
  • Adding textual feedback
  • Fixing minor annoyances or issues

Nothing special to mention here. It’s a part of game dev I find rather boring, but learned to do anyway, because it’s that important. I also don’t think all the special effects work together as well as they could in this game—but hey, I had no more time to spend on this project!

I created a few spritesheets for different clients. (And some differences between them, such as the kid that runs fast but has a tiny backpack.)

I added a timer that counts how long you survived. Felt like an obvious addition. (Otherwise it just says “game over”, no matter how well you did, no matter what happened in your game.)

I added a “sale” mechanic. It’s a special tile that can appear in the store, and shows that a certain ingredient is now worth more. (As such, you DON’T want people to buy that.)

Why? Because there was no point to having different items right now. Each was worth the exact same amount of points. There were no other defining characteristics. With the sale—or rather, the “reverse sale”—you now have one or two items for which you want to watch out.

I wrote down more ideas I could add.

  • Conveyor belts (or teleports, at later stages) to help you move around
  • Other powerups, such as speed up/speed down
  • More client types
  • More applications for dashing, especially a “radius” ability. (Instead of only destroying cells/clients you pass through, do so in a circular radius around you. This would allow easily reaching people at the other side of the aisle, which would take a looong time to reach by walking.)

Maybe I had time to add them, maybe not. But I was a bit tired and wanted to make more progress on my actual main project, so I left it at that.

Below are two more progress videos. (From day 2 and day 3)

Second day of development, almost a playable game, just lacks polish and some finetuning
A recording I did of the near-final game to get screenshots for the itch.io page.


The only “issue” that came from my playtesting, was that the dash powerups were a bit hard to pick up. That was simply a matter of their collision shape being too small, so I made it more than twice as large.

There were some technical issues with sound effects not playing in the HTML5 build of the game. That’s probably due to using Godot 4.0 which has … “unpredictable” HTML5 support. I didn’t feel like wasting time investigating that further, pretty certain I’d hit a wall (and just hear “wait a few months and it will be fixed”).

And that’s the whole devlog!

As I said, I only had about 3 or 4 days for this. I also hadn’t used Godot in a year, and certainly not the latest and greatest 4.0 version, which is why I kept the idea very minimal. And I’m happy most of it just worked out first try, because I wouldn’t have had time to fix any serious roadblocks :p

I really feel like Godot is hitting its stride now. The 4.0 version is amazing in terms of improvements, features, engine size ( = how fast it loads, how small it is), reliability. Creating this game for the jam … has given me back some motivation to make a game again. To make a serious game, which I can release professionally, with the current state of Godot Engine.

Yes, there are still some major bugs or missing parts. (The developers are aware and they’re coming in 4.1 or 4.2.) Last minute, I had to completely redo all my Audio code because some feature just did not work at all and almost no information about that was available. (For those interested: at the moment, you can’t set the AudioPlayer stream property through code, it just won’t work on most exported platforms.)

Similarly, I had to convert all my GPUParticles to CPUParticles last minute. A conversion that went only 95% smoothly. Godot still has some clear roadblocks, but once those are gone, this is an engine I can see myself using for more and bigger games in the future.

I might create and publish my other idea for the jam at some later stage. It was similarly tiny, but I suspect it might work just as well. (The basic mechanics are similar, as they were obviously both conceived for the same jam.)

Until the next devlog,