Common Mistakes
In this course, I’ve often left remarks about the best way to write things. I find this important. Language is about communication, so let’s see how to improve that communication as much as possible.
I’ve told you:
- To use active voice, instead of passive.
- To modify words so they are easy to read or pronounce
- To pick the shortest way of writing something. (Usually by picking the right verb and tense, plus using a lot of referencing.)
This article continues that thought. It’s about common mistakes, but also about simply writing better. Communicating better. Using the right words for the right job. Many expressions mentioned here are grammatically correct—maybe even popular—but should be restricted to speech.
Because what’s the point of learning a language … if you only use it for vague and imprecise communication?
I’ve sorted the mistakes on type. You can disagree with me on these topics! It’s merely advice. My thoughts on how to communicate better.
The book Elements of Style—which I highly recommend—was the inspiration for this article.
Intensifiers
This category holds words that intensify other words. And explains why they are often a bad idea.
Absolutely
Often redundant when used to emphasize adjectives. Either someone is honest, or he isn’t. Absolutely honest doesn’t make him more honest.
This is a general rule: instead of using “very” or “absolutely” to intensify something, try to find a stronger verb or noun. “Absolutely cold” is simply “freezing”. “Absolutely scary” is “frightening”.
Amazing
Overused. Omit it, or at least find a more fitting synonym. If everything is amazing, nothing is.
Certainly
Used too often to intensify any and every statement. Remembe rthe general rule: find one word that says what you want precisely.
Really
Similar to “very”. Don’t use it to modify an adjective, verb or adverb. (At least, not often.) Find a stronger version of the word instead.
So
Avoid using it as an intensifier (so good or so strong).
Very
Use sparingly to exaggerate nouns. If emphasis is necessary, find a strong word.
- Very tired => morose
- Very happy => ecstatic
- Very good => skillful, expert, unparalleled, whatever
Unnecessary
These words are fine, but often unnecessary. Removing them makes communication only shorter and clearer.
Always
If you say something, it is by default always true. For example: “When you add 2 and 2, you get 4.”
There is no need to say: “When you add 2 and 2, you ALWAYS get 4.”
Similarly, “I always go to the gym on Wednesdays” is the same as simply “I go to the gym on Wednesdays”.
As such, this word can be removed 99% of the time.
As to whether
Just whether is sufficient.
I like your idea. As to whether we should spend so much money on it, though …
I like your idea. Whether we should spend so much money on it, though …
Case
Usually unnecessary in these cases:
- Instance of a thing occurring
- Usual state of affairs
In many cases, the houses had been destroyed => Many houses had been destroyed.
Character
Often redundant and used out of habit only.
Acts of a hostile character => Hostile acts
Clever
Overused. Best restricted to ingenuity displayed in small matters. If something is really clever, it should show through the consequences or writing about it.
Dependable
A needless substitute for reliable or trustworthy.
Fact
Use this only of actual facts, matters capable of direct verification. Never use this for matters of judgment, however incontestable they may be.
The phrase “The fact is …” can also be removed if you’re not actually talking about a verifiable fact.
The fact is that writing is hard. => Writing is hard to me.
Factor
Overused. Can often be replaced by something more direct or definite.
Superior preparation was the biggest factor for his win. => He won by preparing better
Feature
Like factor, it usually adds nothing to a sentence.
The homepage featured several images of toys. => The homepage shows images of toys.
To be avoided in the advertising sense of offer as a special attraction.
He is a man who
A common type of redundant expression. Of course, it has variations. “She is a woman who”, “They are a child who”, “It is a country that”, and more.
England is a country which I like => I like England.
He is a man who likes to play games => He likes to play games
Honestly
Often used to add emphasis. But it should be avoided, for it implies that the rest of your statements weren’t honest!
It’s like saying “I will lie now” and then continuing like nothing happened. Scrap it.
Just
Only use it for its original meaning (as a noun): equitable, fair, even-handed or impartial.
If used otherwise, it has no clear meaning and makes your sentences weaker.
It is just cool to see fireworks => It’s cool to see fireworks.
Literally
Literally means something should be understood exactly as it is said. Figuratively means something should be understood as a metaphor or figure of speech for something else.
In most cases, people use the wrong one. In almost all cases, using it is unnecessary anyway.
“He was literally dead with fatigue.”
Hmm. Is he dead now? No. Then it’s not literally.
“He was almost dead with fatigue.” => “He was very tired” => “He was exhausted.”
Maybe
Communicates uncertainty. It is, therefore, great for questions or suggestions.
Any other time, it doesn’t help in any way to add lots of insecurity to what you write. Remove it.
Nature
Often redundant, just like character. Or more specific statements need to follow to explain it.
Acts of a hostile nature => Hostile acts
Never
See “always”.
Oftentimes
Archaic. Use often.
Respectively
May usually be omitted. The reader assumes that the order in which you wrote the sentence, is the order you intended.
I swapped module A and B for module C and D, respectively.
We already assume that A swapped for C and B swapped for D. No need to add “respectively”.
The books are listed under the names of their respective authors => The books are listed under the names of their authors
In some kinds of formal writing (such as geometrical proofs) it is necessary for clarity. But it doesn’t add much otherwise.
Student body
A needless expression, just students is enough.
Stuff
Casual and generic. A placeholder for when the writer doesn’t know the actual word or phrase. If you don’t bother finding out or explaining the details, don’t reference something at all.
System
Frequently used without necessity. Like “stuff”, anything can be a system, right?
They have adopted the commission system of government. => They have adopted government by commission.
That
Superfluous most of the time. Reread every sentence with that and see if you can leave it out.
He saw that the bird was eating => He saw the bird was eating.
Don’t use it with people. They are not objects! The proper word is who.
Things
See “stuff”.
Misspelling & Misuse
All right
Alright has become more popular, but two separate words is technically correct. Used in familiar speech in the sense of “Agreed”, “Go ahead” or “Okay”. Avoid using it for anything else.
Bid
Takes the infinitive without to. The past tense is bade.
I bade him to do it => I bade him do it
Due to
Correctly used when saying because of and then a particular noun.
Losses due to bad policy.
Incorrectly used in adverbial phrases. (So, a seperate sentence giving a reason for the main sentence.)
She lost the game, due to carelessness.
Effect
As noun, means result.
As verb, means to bring about or accomplish.
Not the same as affect: that means “to influence”.
Too often used as a vague substitute when discussing art or creative endeavours. Vagueness is bad.
The painter used very delicate effects. => What does this mean!? Be more precise.
Etc. / etcetera
Equivalent to and the rest or and so forth. Should therefore not be used for people. Or if the reader could be left in doubt as to what “the rest” could be.
Best used to shorten a list which has already been given in full. Or to replace unimportant words at the end of a quotation.
It is incorrect to end lists starting with such as or for example with “etc.”.
Why? It’s a bit weird to start a list of examples, and then just say: “hey, you should just imagine how the other examples go!”
Irregardless
It’s not a word. Regardless already means without regard.
Less
I’ve stated this earlier in the course. I’ll state it again because it’s such a frequent error.
Don’t replace it with fewer. Less only applies to uncountable nouns and comparing quantities.
- Five is less than ten.
- There were less holes in my garden than last year => There were fewer holes in my garden than last year
- His troubles are less than mine => means his troubles are smaller in size
- His troubles are fewer than mine => means his troubles are smaller in number
Kind of
Don’t use it as substitute for …
- Rather (before adjectives and verbs)
- Something like (before nouns)
Restrict it to its actual meaning. Kind means type or embodiment.
He plays guitar with a strange kind of passion.
The same is true for sort of.
One of the most
Avoid beginning paragraphs with this kind of phrase. It takes many words, yet it’s cliché, vague and meaningless.
The guitar is one of the most universally played instruments. => The guitar is a popular instrument.
It’s not wrong. I just don’t like those phrases with many words which can be removed.
Phase
Means stage of transition or development. Does not mean aspect or topic.
To possess
Don’t use it as a substitute for the simpler verbs have or own. It needlessly complicates a sentence.
To state
Don’t use it as a substitute for the specific say or remark. Restrict it to the sense of: express fully or clearly.
While
Don’t use it as a substite for “and” or “but”. Instead, split the sentence in two, or use a semicolon.
Using it for “although” fine, if this doesn’t lead to ambiguity or absurdity.
It’s best to restrict it while to the sense of during the time that.
- I walked to the park, while Susan danced the tango
- I walked to the park; Susan danced the tango
- I walked to the park. Susan danced the tango.
Whom
A (slightly archaic) conjugation of who when it’s the (in)direct object of a sentence.
To whom should I address this letter?
Often incorrectly used for who before he said or similar expressions.
Clarification
As good or better
Rearrange the sentence so that “or better” (or “if not better”) is at the end. It’s easier to read and understand.
This is as good or better than that => This is as good as that, or better
Claim
With object, means lay claim to. Don’t use as a substitute for declare, maintain or charge.
Compare
The preposition makes the difference.
- To compare to is to point out or imply resemblances between objects regarded as different
- To compare with is to point out differences between objects regarded as similar
Consider
When followed by “as” means “believe to be”.
The report is considered as an example of good scientific journarling.
Otherwise means “examined” or “discussed”.
He considered the writings on the wall.
Fix
Colloquial (in American English) for arrange, prepare or mend. It’s used, more and more, on everything. And when you use one word for everything, communication loses meaning.
I fixed the internt issues => I (re)solved the internet issues.
Hey, let me fix that for you => Hey, let me help you with that.
Restrict it to its original meaning: to fasten, make firm.
Or, as a noun (fixed), it means rigid or immovable.
However
Comes first in the sentence when it means “in whatever way” or “to whatever extent”.
However hard you try, it won’t happen.
Place it after the subject or verb otherwise. (When it means nevertheless.)
I feel sorry for him. It is, however, not my problem.
Lose out
Used to sound more emphatic than lose.
Ah, you barely lost out on winning that prize!
But it doesn’t work. The same holds for try out, win out, sign up and register up.
A number of verbs form combinations with out and up, with different meanings
Lose out does not.
Near by
Analogous with close by and hard by. But it’s usually written as one word: nearby.
Near (at hand), however, is as good, if not better.
Not so nice as an adjective. I prefer neighbouring.
We walked from our house to a nearby cottage. => We walked from our house to a neighbouring cottage.
Use “adjacent” if something is right next to something else.
One hundred and one
Retain the “and” in this and similar expressions. Don’t be tempted to write “one hundred one”.
People
The people is a political term. They create political support or opposition.
The public is the right word otherwise. Artistic appreciation or commercial support comes from “the public”.
Some people prefer using “persons” after a plural number, instead of “people”. I’m on the fence about that.
Viewpoint
Don’t use it for view or opinion.
I prefer point of view. But viewpoint has become more common and accepted. For example, when a book is told from the perspective of someone, they are called a “viewpoint character” now.
Went
Don’t use went for every action in your story. Consider more definite statements, such as walked, ran, drove, cycled.
He went to the bar. Then he went fishing. => He drove to the bar, and fished in the lake afterwards.
Worth while
A very new expression. I used to dislike it, but it’s grown on me.
Can be used to show (dis)approval or how much you think something is worth. Can come before a noun or verb, although usage before a noun is frowned upon.
Is it worthwhile to phone him?
It was a worthwhile visit to the zoo.
Would
A conditional statement in the first person requires should, not would.
I should have died if he hadn’t saved me.
This probably comes from the fact that it’s you saying something about yourself. So you should know this statement for certain, instead of the uncertain “would”.
The same is true for indirect quotations.
He said that soon enough the earth should be hit by an asteroid.
To express habitual or repeated action, the past tense (without would) is usually sufficient.
Once a year he would visit his grandmother. => Once a year he visited his grandmother.
Want to support me?
Buy one of my projects. You get something nice, I get something nice.
Donate through a popular platform using the link below.
Simply giving feedback or spreading the word is also worth a lot.